Counting Rankings

نویسنده

  • Jason Riggle
چکیده

In this paper, I present a recursive algorithm that calculates the number of rankings that are consistent with a set of data (i.e. optimal candidates) in the framework of Optimality Theory. The ability to compute this quantity, which I call the r-volume, makes possible a simple and effective Bayesian heuristic in learning – all else equal, choose the candidate preferred by the highest number of constraint rankings consistent with previous observations. Using this heuristic, I formulate a learning algorithm that is guaranteed to make fewer than k log2 k errors while learning rankings of k constraints. This log-linear mistake bound is an improvement over the quadratic mistake bound of Recursive Constraint Demotion and is within a logarithmic factor of the best possible mistake bound for OT learning. I conclude with an illustration of learning syllable structure grammars to contrast the learning curves with the mistake bounds and computational requirements of several ranking algorithms.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias

This paper examines the effects of inflationary and equalizing bias on publication output rankings. Any identifiable amount of bias in authorship accreditation was detrimental to accuracy when ranking a select group of leading Canadian aquaculture researchers. Bias arose when publication scores were calculated without taking into account information about multiple authorship and differential co...

متن کامل

Counting Methods & University Ranking by H-Index

This paper describes the results from using four counting methods that represented three different counting approaches – i.e., whole counting, straight counting, and fractional counting, on university rankings based on Hindex. Using a large bibliometric dataset that contained 20 years of physics research papers and citations from Web of Science, we tested the methods on the data and sorted 299 ...

متن کامل

Sampling Rankings

Abstract In this work, I present a recursive algorithm for computing the number of rankings consistent with a set of optimal candidates in the framework of Optimality Theory. The ability to measure this quantity, which I call the r-volume, allows a simple and effective Bayesian strategy in learning: choose the candidate preferred by a plurality of the rankings consistent with previous observati...

متن کامل

Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: Differences in citation behavior at the level of fields

Van Raan et al. (2010; arXiv:1003.2113) have proposed a new indicator (MNCS) for field normalization. Since field normalization is also used in the Leiden Rankings of universities, we elaborate our critique of journal normalization in Opthof & Leydesdorff (2010; arXiv:1002.2769) in this rejoinder concerning field normalization. Fractional citation counting thoroughly solves the issue of normali...

متن کامل

Invited talk: Counting Rankings

In this talk, I present a recursive algorithm to calculate the number of rankings that are consistent with a set of data (optimal candidates) in the framework of Optimality Theory (OT; Prince and Smolensky 1993).1 Computing this quantity, which I call r-volume, makes possible a simple and effective Bayesian heuristic in learning – all else equal, choose candidates that are preferred by the high...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010